|
| |
UK Lock Hospitals
Lock Hospitals had to wage a battle with
popular prejudice which was quite unlike
that which the other specialist
hospitals had to fight. Not only was the
malady they dealt with looked upon as
practically incapable of cure, but
bigots considered it unworthy of cure;
it was sin's just punishment of outraged
nature, when it was not looked upon as a
special act of the divine wrath.
For this reason, syphilitic patients
were regularly refused admission to
general hospitals on religious grounds,
being considered as much social outcasts
as the lepers of old, from whom, their
name is supposed to be derived.
The connection is both historical and
etymological, according to Mr. Godfrey
Hamilton (Secretary of the National
Hospital for Paralysed and Epileptic)
who, some years ago, published an
interesting series of articles in the
Hospital Gazette on the subject. "In a
large number of cases", he writes, "the
abolition of the Lazar House was delayed
by the advent of venereal disease, which
took place in this Country
coincidentally with the decline of
leprosy, so the houses being no longer
required for lepers were utilised for
patients suffering from these other
loathsome diseases. Notable examples of
this are the Lazar houses which were
founded outside the City of London - at
Southwark, Mile End, Kingsland,
Knightsbridge, etc. As these buildings
were converted to their new use, they
seem to have become known as lock-houses
or lock hospitals, and at the present
day practically all hospitals, it might
be said throughout the whole world,
which are devoted to the treatment of
social diseases are designated by that
term .... but almost all writers claim
that the first hospital so designated
was the Lock Lazar House outside St
George's Gate".
Page updated
August 06, 2007
Copyright © Rossbret 1999-2008. All rights reserved.
If you have any information or photographs that you can add to this site, please
email
webmaster@institutions.org.uk
|